| Clinical Findings Symptoms and Signs Patients should be asked about the consistency and color of the discharge and whether it is accompanied by pruritus (internal and external), irritation, or a fishy odor. Another useful question is whether a fishy odor is present after unprotected intercourse (a characteristic finding in bacterial vaginosis). During the examination, the clinician should note the presence or absence of vaginal ulcerations, erythema, characteristics (color and consistency) of the discharge, and the appearance of the cervix (mucopus at the os may suggest gonorrhea or chlamydia). Laboratory Findings The most widely used tests for the diagnosis of vaginitis are vaginal pH evaluation, the so-called "whiff" test, and light microscopy (see Table 2–1). Light microscopy is the most helpful of the three tests. | Table 2–1. Laboratory and Other Studies for Vaginitis.
| | | Test | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Comments | | Vaginal pH | 89 (for diagnosis) | 73 (for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis) | Normal pH is <4.5. | | Blood, semen, cervical secretions may interfere with test. | | pH is usually normal in candidiasis and >4.5 in bacterial vaginosis and trichomoniasis; however, trichomoniasis may be present with a normal pH. | | "Whiff" test of vaginal secretions | 43 (for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis) | 91 (for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis) | Add 10% KOH to vaginal secretions; test is positive if a fishy smell is present (volatilization of amines produced by anaerobes); positive in bacterial vaginosis and sometimes in trichomoniasis. | | Microscopic examination of vaginal fluid (wet mount) | - 65–85 (for yeast infection)
- 60 (for trichomoniasis)
- 80 (for bacterial vaginosis)
| — | Mix secretions in small amount of saline and observe using "high dry" 40 x lens. Note presence of budding yeast and pseudohyphae, motile trichomonads, and clue cells (squamous epithelial cells covered with bacteria whose edges are obscured). | | Observe number and type of bacteria: moderate numbers of large rods represent lactobacilli (normal flora); large numbers of coccobacilli or motile curved rods are highly suggestive of bacterial vaginosis. | | Use of KOH prep may be helpful in identifying yeast infection because KOH dissolves the other cellular elements; demonstration of yeast infection is subject to sampling error; examination of repeated slide preparations can be helpful. | | Note; Mixed infections can occur. | | Amsel criteria for bacterial vaginosis | 70 (compared with Gram stain) | 94 (compared with Gram stain) | 3 of the following 4 signs must be present: vaginal pH > 4.5, positive "whiff" test, presence of clue cells, homogenous vaginal discharge. | | Gram stain of vaginal secretions for bacterial vaginosis | 89 (compared with Amsel criteria [22]) | 83 (compared withGram stain) | Nugent method is the most widely used; determines quantities of 3 different bacterial morphotypes: large gram-positive rods (lactobacilli), small gram-variable coccobacilli (Gardnerella, Prevotella), and curved rods (Mobiluncus). Score ranges from 1 to 10; 0–3 = normal, 4–6 = intermediate, and 7–10 = bacterial vaginosis. | | Culture for yeast or Gardnerella vaginalis | — | — | Not routinely indicated; may detect colonization as opposed to infection. | | InPouch TV culture for Trichomonas vaginalis | 90–95 | 100 | Commercially available culture media inoculated at beside is currently the "gold standard"; compared with culture, wet mount has a sensitivity of 60%. | | A self-obtained specimen may be used with culture in special settings. | | Vaginal specimen may be transported to laboratory on an Amies gel transport swab before inoculation into culture pouch. | | Osom Trichomonas Rapid Test | 80 (compared with InPouch TV) | 98.6 | ELISA strip test for vaginal samples | | CLIA complexity: waived | | Affirm VPIII | - 94 (for bacterial vaginosis)
- 80 (for trichomoniasis)
| - 81 (for bacterial vaginosis)
- 98 (for trichomoniasis)
| Semiautomated office-based test to distinguish between etiologic agents of vaginitis | | QuickVue Advance pH and Amines Test Card | 87 | 92 | Rapid card test for pH and amines; if positive, consistent with bacterial vaginosis but further testing is needed to rule out mixed infections | | CLIA complexity: waived | | QuickVue Advance G vaginalis Test | 90 | 97 | Rapid card test for bacterial vaginosis; detects proline iminopeptidase | | CLIA complexity: moderate | | Osom BVBlue | 90.3 | 96.6 | Rapid colorometric test for sialidase production by anaerobes associated with bacterial vaginosis; limited data on performance | | CLIA complexity: moderate | | CLIA, Clinical Laboratories Improvement Act; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. | Vaginal pH The vaginal pH is best measured using pH paper strips (ColorpHast indicator strips, EM Science, Gibbstown, NJ). The color resulting from contact of the vaginal fluid with the indicator paper can be compared directly with the color chart on the container. When collecting specimens for pH evaluation, care should be taken to avoid cervical secretions. These are normally more alkaline than secretions from the healthy vagina and may falsely influence the pH reading. Other factors that can influence the pH result are semen and blood in the sample. Semen is alkaline, and blood obscures the color change on the indicator paper. The vaginal pH is normally 4.5 in the presence of predominantly lactobacillus flora; this includes the healthy vagina as well as one in which yeast infection is present. An elevated pH is indicative of bacterial vaginosis or trichomoniasis, although in some patients with trichomoniasis, the pH may be normal. "Whiff" Test The most expeditious way to collect the vaginal specimen for both the "whiff" test and microscopy is to place a generous amount of vaginal discharge collected from the lateral vaginal wall into a small glass tube containing 0.3 mL of normal saline. This method allows for preparation of cover-slipped slides at the microscope, and for multiple preparations if required. The "whiff" test is performed by mixing a drop of the vaginal saline mixture with 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) and then sniffing for a fishy smell. The fishy odor indicates the presence of volatilized amines associated with the anaerobic flora typical of bacterial vaginosis; however, the test is highly subjective. Light Microscopy The cover-slipped specimen is examined at 400 x magnification under reduced light. When examining the fluid, the clinician should note the presence of white blood cells, parabasal cells, motile trichomonads, budding yeast and pseudohyphae, clue cells, and bacteria (specifying the type, if present). White blood cells are frequently present in vaginal secretions of patients with candidiasis and trichomoniasis. They may also be present, along with parabasal cells, in women with atrophic vaginitis or desquamative inflammatory vaginitis. White blood cells may also be seen in patients with bacterial vaginosis as a result of a vaginal or cervical coinfection. Although direct microscopic examination of the vaginal fluid for motile trichomonads is the fastest, least expensive diagnostic method for trichomoniasis, the sensitivity of this test compared with culture is only 60%. Perhaps the most difficult diagnosis to confirm microscopically is that of candidiasis. The presence of budding yeast without the report of symptoms compatible with a yeast infection may simply represent colonization. On the other hand, clumps of pseudohyphae in vaginal secretions of a patient with candidiasis can be difficult to visualize and may require examination of multiple preparations. The addition of KOH, which dissolves other cellular elements, may be helpful. Amsel Criteria The most commonly used diagnostic method for bacterial vaginosis is the Amsel criteria, which comprises four findings: (1) a homogenous vaginal discharge, (2) vaginal pH higher than 4.5, (3) positive "whiff" test, and (4) clue cells on direct microscopic examination of the vaginal fluid (wet mount). If three of these four findings are present, the diagnostic criteria for bacterial vaginosis are met. Clue cells, defined as squamous epithelial cells covered with bacteria to the extent that the edges of the cell are obscured, are also subject to the interpretation of the microscopist. The careful observer, however, will go beyond the Amsel criteria to note the amount and morphotypes of the vaginal bacteria in the wet mount. In bacterial vaginosis, there will be many coccobacillary morphotypes and a paucity of large rods, which represent the lactobacilli. Motile curved rods, which represent Mobiluncus, are pathognomonic for bacterial vaginosis. Special Tests Additional tests are commercially available for point-of-care testing of vaginitis. Several rapid card tests are available. One test detects proline aminopeptidase, an enzyme found in the vaginal secretions of women with bacterial vaginosis (QuickVue Advance G vaginalis Test, Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA). A second test detects elevated pH and amines (QuickVue Advance pH and Amines Test Card, Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA) and may be a useful screening tool for determining patients who should receive a more thorough evaluation. A third, rapid colorometric test for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis detects sialidase in the vaginal fluid (Osom BVBlue Test, Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA). A semiautomated test for vaginitis, which includes trichomoniasis, candidiasis, and bacterial vaginosis, is also available (Affirm VPIII, Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD). A point-of-care enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)–based test for trichomonas has recently been licensed (Osom Trichomonas Rapid Test, Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA). This strip test is used with vaginal secretions, has a sensitivity of approximately 80% compared with culture, and is easy to perform. Routine bacterial culture of vaginal secretions is not helpful and can be misleading. Culturing for Trichomonas vaginalis may be helpful in patients without a confirmed diagnosis, because culture is more sensitive for the diagnosis of trichomoniasis than the wet mount. Sobel JD. Vaginitis. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1896–1903. (Useful review of vaginitis.) [PMID: 9407158]
| |